Thursday, July 18, 2024

Microcosmos Updates Entry #5 : "The Wave-Makers"


TLDR; After researching two unusual forms of bacterial locomotion, I've begun to rethink my assumption that rotary motors are the best way for microbes to get around. Perhaps the dominant forms of microbial life on other planets will resort to other, far stranger ways of traveling through watery and gel-like environments. 


     As many of you are probably aware, bacteria make use of a wide range of motility mechanisms. Some use their pili to crawl along surfaces, many control their buoyancy through internal gas vacuoles, and others make implement several forms of gliding which result from a variety of different mechanisms. However, the most dominant form of bacterial locomotion relies on the flagellum; a long, filamentous appendage powered by an internal motor. This motor rotates 360 degrees and is powered by the flow of protons from one side of the membrane to the other, much like how the flow of water causes a turbine to spin in a hydroelectric dam. 

     This spinning generates a tremendous amount of torque and enables bacteria to propel themselves forwards (and occasionally backwards) through the water. Some bacteria even have bundles of flagella which interweave to generate more thrust. These bundles can also disperse when rotated clockwise, allowing the bacterium to randomly spin and travel in a different direction. This form of locomotion is known as "running and tumbling" and when coupled with chemotaxis or phototaxis, can steer bacteria towards and away from harmful stimuli. 



 

(Top) A 3D model of the flagellar motor found in bacteria (Bottom) A diagram demonstrating 
how "running and tumbling" directs bacteria towards favorable environments.


     In more unusual cases, the flagella will form bundles within the cell that become sandwiched between two membranes. These "axial filaments" rapidly spin within the organism and cause it to vibrate. These vibrations, coupled with the helical-shape of Spirochetes (a successful group of anaerobic and microaerophilic bacteria), is what enables them to rotate in a corkscrew-like fashion and to burrow through viscous substances (such as the mucus that lines your stomach or the extracellular matrix that gives biofilms their structure). 

*NOTE: This motion can also be used quite effectively for swimming (Check out the video down below).  


(Top) A cross-section of a Spirochete. (Bottom) A microcolony of Spirochetes 
viewed under a scanning electron microscope. 


     However, in researching bacterial movement, I came across something absolutely extraordinary; bacteria that swim without flagella! 

     The first one I came across might be familiar to some of you if you've watched "Journey to The Microcosmos", "PBS Eons", or just have an interest in marine biology. It's a tiny, highly-successful Cyanobacterium by the name of Synechococcus. 

     Ever since the 80's, researchers have noted their peculiar form of swimming and how it doesn't seem to result from any external motor or means of propulsion. While the mechanism that drives this form of movement is still the subject of debate, recent models suggest that the cells makes use of a helical track system underneath their cell walls. This track system is likely composed of cytoskeletal filaments and would transport tiny "cargo proteins". As they do so, the movement of the cargo proteins causes deformations in the cell wall, creating wave-like contractions that run from pole to pole, generating thrust.  

     Interestingly, a similar system of tracks can be found across many distantly-related gliding bacteria, including Myxobacteria and possibly filamentous Cyanobacteria related to Synechococcus (although hard evidence has yet to be found for its existence in the latter). In these cases, the bacteria secrete "slime" (a loose tangle of polysaccharides) through specialized pores. This slime expands like shaving cream and propels them forward. Meanwhile, the contractions along the cell's body help to anchor them into the trail of slime and push off from it, generating even more thrust and enabling the bacterium to more effectively glide across surfaces. 


(Top) The "Gliding System" observed within a number of diverse, non-flagellated bacteria (possibly including Synechococcus). (Bottom) A putative model of Synechococcus, demonstrating the wave-like bulges that extend from the leading end of the cell to the other (Note that propulsion only occurs in one direction.)


     However, such a mechanism has never been observed aiding an organism in swimming. In fact, it was once thought that this system of movement would be impractical for traveling through water, since it likely wouldn't displace enough water molecules to propel the cell forward. 

     But in a study conducted back in 1996, it was proposed that specialized S-layer proteins on the surface of the Synechococcus may aid in motility by bulging outward when the cargo proteins pass underneath them. In theory, this would cause a larger ripple to form on the organism's surface that can displace even more water. With this, it was believed that these tiny Cyanobacteria were able to generate the necessary thrust, traveling at speeds of roughly 5 to 25 microns per second. 

     Soon after this proposal was made, mutant strains were created that lacked this protein. As a result, they were unable to swim and simply spun around in circles, confirming the role of the S-layer proteins as "little oars" and that they were being pushed by some unseen mechanism beneath the cell wall. 



(Above) An illustration, showing how the S-Layer proteins (shown in green) would lift up 
as the cargo protein (shown in blue) passes underneath them. 


     As for the affect motility has on the ecology of Synechococcus, it doesn't appear to be all that useful at first glance, given how slow it is in comparison to some other forms of locomotion (some prokaryotes can travel as fast as 500 microns per second!) However, one study found that the strain WH8102 was capable of preforming chemotaxis towards sources of nitrogen, suggesting that swimming might play a vital role in allowing the Cyanobacterium to forage for metabolites in the nutrient-poor waters of the open ocean (With that said though, it still remains unclear as to how the cells change their direction beyond simply bumping into surfaces.)


"Serpentine-Swimmers"

     Meanwhile, in contrast to Synechococcus, a more versatile form of swimming can be observed in another bacterium known as Spiroplasma. During which, the cell's corkscrew-shaped body undergoes wave-like undulations that cause the organism to bend back and forth, much like a snake as it slithers along the ground. This serpentine locomotion enables it to rapidly navigate through viscous environments within the circulatory systems of insects. Also, unlike the Synechococcus, Spiroplasma's form of locomotion can propel the cell along a number of different paths by altering the way in which the leading end of the cell bends or by reversing the direction of its undulations. As a result, Spiroplasma is able to preform it's own method of chemotaxis. 



(Top) A biofilm containing Spiroplasma cells (The helical, spirochete-like organisms). (Bottom) While we still don't understand the exact mechanism behind Spiroplasma's form of locomotion, this is a model of what might be happening on the interior of the cell. In this diagram, it's shown how specialized proteins within the organism form a semi-rigid "backbone", with each protein either consolidating or pushing away from one another when ATP is introduced. This presumably results in the the "relaxed side" developing a convex curve and the "contracted side" developing a concave curve. These undulations would then travel along the organism's length from pole to pole, resulting in their characteristic "slithering" motion.



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Wave-Makers" on Leeuwenhoek

     After reading about these unusual forms of locomotion, it got me thinking of whether similar strategies could become far more widespread and versatile on Leeuwenhoek, perhaps even partially replacing spinning propellers as the dominant means of propulsion. While I'm still under the impression that rotating motors are likely to convergently evolve and reappear on Leeuwenhoek (given the fact that they evolved twice independently on Earth within bacteria and archaea respectively), I imagine that wave-like contractions could still play an important role in enabling cells to travel within environments of either high or low viscosity.

     As a result, Leeuwenhoek now hosts a three primary forms of swimming. The most common and versatile is based around a propeller, much like the proton motive force-based flagellum found in bacteria. Similarly, the "moneral flagella" is only found within one domain, roughly comparable to bacteria in terms of ecology, habitat range, membrane morphology, etc. 

     In contrast, Synechoccus-like swimmers would be dominant within a domain analogous to archaea, having evolved from an ancestral gliding lineage. However, unlike Synechococcus, this form of swimming is reversible (much like how many gliding bacteria on Earth can reverse the movement of their cargo proteins to change their orientation in the environment). In addition, this system of tracks and cargo would often be accompanied by another group of cytoskeletal filaments which aid in changing the cell's shape. 

     By flexing, swimming filaments and rods can alter their direction and engage in a crude form of steering. If the curve is highly pronounced, the cell will begin to spin randomly, allowing them to preform a unique form of "running and tumbling".

     Furthermore, some Synechococcus-like swimmers have larger surface proteins which enable more efficient water displacement and faster movement. As a result, speed can vary considerably ranging anywhere from 5-50 or so microns per second. (While I don't imagine that this would make them the fastest organisms on Leeuwenhoek, it would definitely enable more rapid responses to environmental changes.)

     Lastly, some Synechococcus-like swimmers may abandon the wave-like contractions altogether in favor of a system of locomotion that relies more heavily on rapid longitudinal flexing. These Spiroplasma-like organisms would be especially prevalent in viscous environments (i.e. microbial mats, biofilms, organic-rich sediments, etc.) and would fill the ecological role of Spirochetes on Leeuwenhoek. 

*NOTE: I'm still undecided on whether or not I will describe their locomotion mechanism in detail or leave it unexplored when I include them in the book. However, there is a good chance they might make use of an undulating backbone that is similar to the one in the model above, or possibly a highly-simplified mechanism that is analogous to the one that is present within eukaryotic flagella (check out the video down below).

     For now, these three forms of motility don't have names, but feel free to recommend some to me through discord! (either through the official microcosmos discord server or my channel on the official spec evo server.) 



Supplemental Material : 

Footage of Spirochetes :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXYfT5hSLoQ

An Old German Documentary about Myxobacteria (a commonly-studied predatory bacterium that moves through gliding and flexing) :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHGEi2JzXso

Grainy, "found-footage" style clips of synechococcus swimming : 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4jql9hgaE8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEKIK-H6Ty8

Footage of Spiroplasma :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQzILpQ3RpU

3D Model of The Eukaryotic Flagellum :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nZYlyFGm50

Citations :

- https://www.caister.com/backlist/jmmb/v/v1/v1n1/09.pdf

- https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036081

- https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.706426/full

https://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822(13)01593-5.pdf




Thursday, July 11, 2024

Microbe Spotlight #4 : "The Rope-Builders"


TLDR; Cyanobacteria can form complex supracellular structures called "ropes" that act as protective safe-havens for other bacteria. Here, we'll be discussing their function, evolutionary history, and how they might have aided life in conquering the land.  


     Recently, I've become fascinated with this cyanobacteria called "Microcoleus". Unlike most of the filamentous cyanobacteria that show up in my samples, their trichomes are housed within a communal sheath and glide back and fourth, traveling along its length like an underground subway tunnel. This behavior is known as "rope-building" and seems to have evolved in multiple lineages of cyanobacteria, but is most well studied in Microcoleus

     At first glace, it seems like such a behavior would be fairly maladaptive, since grouping together in tight bundles would lead to competition for light and metabolites amongst the trichomes. However, it seems that Microcoleus uses its thick, gelatinous sheaths to stabilize loose sediments by binding sand grains together. By doing so, it is able to monopolize environments that are often too difficult for other cyanobacteria to colonize. 


(Top) Microcoleus chthonoplastes binding sand grains together within an intertidal mat. (Bottom) M. chthonoplastes alongside other cyanobacteria and diatoms.


     For this reason, Microcoleus and other rope-builders are often the first organisms to take root in such habitats and serve as a stable foundation for other organisms to attach to. The sheaths can also serve a number of other functions as well, such as water retention and UV absorption. Because of this, these cyanobacteria are especially good at forming biocrusts (terrestrial microbial mats) in dry, inland habitats and in forming the scaffolding for more diverse communities. 

     However, there are also cases in which Microcoleus live as solitary individuals and only bundle together in response to the low nitrogen availability (a common problem faced by bacteria in oligotrophic environments), such as in the case of M. vaginatus. While M. vaginatus are not capable of nitrogen fixation on their own, their aggregation seems to attract a "cyanosphere"; a tiny community of heterotrophic bacteria which feed upon the photosynthate (carbohydrates produced via photosynthesis) excreted into the environment by cyanobacteria. In exchange, the heterotrophic bacteria are able to fix nitrogen and gather phosphorous from the environment and share them with their tube-building partners. 



(Above) The shared, gelatinous sheath of M. vaginatus.


     The reason for this selective bundling is still unknown, since plenty of cyanobacteria form cyanospheres without sorting themselves into aggregates. Multiple proposals have been put forward, but perhaps the most interesting is the idea that M. vaginatus congregate in an effort to locally deplete the oxygen in various parts of the biocrust where they live, thereby providing their nitrogen-fixing partners with protection from oxygen (This makes sense, given that previous studies have shown that biocrusts develop anoxic microhabitats at night when photosynthetic activity is temporarily shut-down.)   

     Regardless, their ability to work together with nitrogen-fixers enables them to thrive in inhospitable environments where nitrogen is the primary limiting nutrient. For that reason, I've been very interested in whether similar organisms could have colonized dry, nitrogen-poor continents on the early Earth (or perhaps the similar conditions on Leeuwenhoek.) 

     However, their fossil record is fairly spotty, with the oldest instances occurring roughly 1.0 BYA in what is now Northwestern Siberia. The late emergence of rope-builders might have occurred in response to the gradual diversification of predatory eukaryotes, poor preservation, or perhaps the expansion of oxygenated, terrestrial habitats where the localized depletion of oxygen would have come in handy. For now, they represent a small glimpse into what life could have been like on the early Earth, back when the land had remained largely unconquered and cooperation was necessary for survival.  

 

Citations : 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007801

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344383451_A_symbiotic_nutrient_exchange_within_the_cyanosphere_microbiome_of_the_biocrust_cyanobacterium_Microcoleus_vaginatus

https://www.paleoitalia.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/13_Sergeev.pdf

https://paleobotany.ru/palynodata/species/113445


Friday, July 5, 2024

"Turns out that microbes really do use sulfide-eating filaments as buses!" (Follow-up from Microcosmos Updates Entry #3)

 

     In "Microcosmos Updates Entry #3", I speculated on how microorganisms within marine depositional habitats on Earth and Leeuwenhoek may behave and interact with one another. To my knowledge, all of the behaviors I proposed hadn't been recorded in the literature, but I figured that they might have flown under the radar and could still be out there. However, what I didn't expect was to see some of those behaviors come to life right in front of me!

     In this video, I discuss some of my observations of epibionts hitching a ride on Beggiatoa that I collected from a nearby estuary. This is likely the first time this behavior has ever been filmed or observed within intertidal environments! 

     While it's still too early to say whether the epibionts are relying upon the Beggiatoa to aid them in acquiring resources on opposite ends of the redox gradient, I strongly believe that this might be the most plausible scenario given the tremendous ecological advantage it would offer them. Regardless, it's still fascinating to see something from my spec project being mirrored so closely in reality!

Link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUO-Prg2rMs 




(Left) My illustration of a Beggiatoa-like organism on Leeuwenhoek transporting epibionts along the redox gradient. (Right) A real Beggiatoa filament transporting rod-shaped
epibionts in a similar manner.



Wednesday, July 3, 2024

Microcosmos Updates Entry #4 : Freshwater Habitats, Meromictic Lakes, And Microbial Plumes

 
TLDR; In this update, we're going to be traveling further inland to examine the ecology of Leeuwenhoek's lakes. While most are low in biodiversity and are generally unassuming, some harbor an alien landscape of purple clouds, microbial towers, and organisms that kill their competitors with the power of the sun.      

     On Leeuwenhoek, many of the ingredients essential for life are in limited supply. Phosphorous, iron, molybdenum, vanadium, copper, and many others constrain the spread of microorganisms and their ability to change the world around them. As a result, Leeuwenhoek's surface can only support a thin dusting of life, only visible to someone with a good eye or the proper equipment. However, this coating of microbes isn't of a consistent "thickness" all throughout. 

     Sometimes, when mechanical and chemical erosion locally concentrate nutrients, populations of microbes are free to expand and form dense communities. And on occasion, these communities radically change the environment around them to their liking, forming colorful mats, stromatolites, and planktonic blooms.   

     In the previous update, we visited the coast and observed how tidal erosion can fuel the growth of microbial mats and planktonic communities within shallow marine habitats and how organic matter produced within these environments can then be washed into deeper waters, forming large depositional habitats along continental shelves and slopes. Within these environments, chemoautotrophs form the base of a highly-productive ecosystem largely independent from sunlight. In some cases, these ecosystems radically alter the chemistry of the ocean and sediment around them, paving the way for widespread euxinia, for new niches, and for greater ecological complexity. 

*NOTE: While it's true these deep marine habitats are mostly sustained by light-independent metabolisms (also known as dark chemoautotrophy, dark heterotrophy, and dark fermentation), some organisms might make use of infrared light produced by other microbes as excess metabolic heat. There is a precedent for this, given that some slow-growing green sulfur bacteria have been found to use infrared light in a similar manner around hydrothermal vents. However, whether or not the meager amount of infrared light generated by microbes is sufficient for photosynthesis is something that will have to be investigated in the future. 

     Meanwhile, within freshwater lakes and inland seas, microbes are also modifying the environment around them. These habitats are known as depositional basins and tend to favor the growth of benthic communities similar to those covered in the previous updates, complete with sulfur cycles that are somewhat analogous to those found in the ocean. However, unlike marine depositional habitats, the basins derive much of their detritus from other sources aside from tides. The most important of which are rivers. 

*NOTE: On Earth, sulfur is a limiting nutrient within freshwater environments and is far more abundant in marine habitats due to the presence tidal erosion. As a result, most lakes and ponds tend to contain very little biogenic sulfur cycling (With that said, some sulfur oxidizing and reducing organisms do exist within ponds and lakes. For instance, Beggiatoa can typically be found in freshwater sediments, but are generally less prolific than those in marine samples). However, by studying Leeuwenhoek's host star (Tau Ceti), we can infer that the planet's interior has a magnesium-silicon ratio of 7:4 (For context, Earth has a ratio of 9:7). Because of this, Leeuwenhoek's interior would favor the development of the mineral olivine, rather than pyroxene. As a consequence, the mantle also contains far more free ferric iron, which serves as an excellent electron acceptor. Under these oxidizing conditions, sulfur dioxide would become the most abundant sulfur species in the mantle and would be readily outgassed into the atmosphere during volcanism. Since Leeuwenhoek is currently experiencing an episode of extreme tectonic activity within the northwestern hemisphere, this would result in sulfur dioxide accumulating on the surface and precipitating as sulfite (a highly coveted electron acceptor for microbial metabolism), thus explaining why marine and freshwater ecosystems on Leeuwenhoek tend to be so similar. 

Disclaimer : While this planet is meant to serve as a generalized model of how oxygenated biospheres may develop in the absence of complex life, the unique sulfur cycling on Leeuwenhoek is an example of how stochastic processes (i.e. star formation, planetary composition, plate tectonics, etc.) can result in very different outcomes for microbially-dominated worlds. In the future, I hope to expand upon this idea by discussing worlds that have traveled along different developmental paths, with less active plate tectonics, more metallicity, or that are towards the end of their lifespans. 

     Since rivers facilitate continuous erosion, they are also able to supply microbes with essential nutrients. All the communities along the sediment have to do is hold on tight and let dissolved ions and organics suspended in the currents wash over them. 

     Over time, the edges and bottoms of active rivers can become highly productive ecosystems dominated by photosynthetic mats. As this occurs, primary producers fix carbon and nitrogen from the atmosphere and provide communities downstream with detritus. 

     Upon reaching a lake or pond, dissolved carbon and organic particles in the river will gradually sink to the bottom, filling the basin with a thin dusting of detritus. Depending on the amount of productivity in the river, the sediments of these basins can become saturated with organic material, developing carbon-rich strata ranging from a few millimeters to several meters in depth. 

     Additionally, lakes and inland seas can acquire organics from other sources as well. For instance, if a body of water is in close proximity to the coast, it can become inundated with sea spray (tiny, aerosolized droplets of seawater). Within this fine mist, organics produced by coastal microbial mats and planktonic communities can become concentrated and delivered further inland by passing winds. Alternatively, glaciers in the upper latitudes can weather rock into sediment known as glacial till. When the glaciers melt during the summer months on Leeuwenhoek, this material is delivered down stream, along with catalytic ions liberated from the rocks. As a result, seasonally frozen lakes and brine pools can also become more productive over time. 



(Above) A diagram displaying the nutrient cycling that takes place within a coastal lake in Antarctica. Since many bodies of water in Antarctica receive very little nutrient input from terrestrial plants and animals, they serve as excellent models for how nutrients might become concentrated within lakes on Leeuwenhoek.


     Regardless of its origin, this organic material serves as a growth medium for a host of heterotrophic and chemoautotrophic organisms. If present in great enough numbers, these microbes will go on to rapidly deplete the sediment and detrital layers of oxygen. However, from this point onward, mixing regimes begin to play an important role in determining the ultimate fate of the basin ecosystem.

     For example, freshwater basins and inland seas where winds and storms are present throughout much of the year support continuous mixing. This results in the basins becoming well aerated and causes the anoxic zone to retreat further down into the sediment. Meanwhile, lakes with less frequent turnover will remain stratified for much of the year, containing oxygen within their upper layers and hypoxic or anoxic conditions within their underlying waters. However, periodic disturbances can lead to these stratified lakes becoming aerated, resulting in alternating cycles of oxygen rich and oxygen-poor conditions. 

     In addition, lakes within Leeuwenhoek's temperate environments experience mild winters due to the planet's slight axial tilt of 13.4 degrees. During which, oxygen-rich surface waters cool and sink to the bottom, aerating the oxygen-poor waters below. Eventually, the newly-oxygenated bottom layer will gradually return to being deprived of oxygen as microbes continue to feast on the underlying detritus.

     However, the fate of most stagnant bodies of water is far less eventful. Without a sufficient means of accumulating detritus, isolated bodies of water remain poor in nutrients and organic carbon. As a result, their entire water column remains permanently aerobic, with little to no change in dissolved oxygen levels. 

     In contrast, the most interesting bodies of water from an ecological perspective are the permanently stratified lakes, inland seas, and sink holes. These environments support massive deposits of organic matter which rapidly deplete oxygen levels as they gradually decompose. However, unlike the other examples mentioned prior, these bodies of water experience meromixis; a condition in which the bottom of the water column becomes enriched in salts. This saltwater can enter coastal lakes as seawater percolates through porous rock or can wash in during coastal storms. Alternatively, dolomite (a mineral made by microbes on Earth through passive biomineralization) commonly occurs on Leeuwenhoek and can form massive deposits. As a consequence, groundwater that comes into contact with the dolomite can become saturated with salts and contaminate nearby bodies of water (Because of this, ponds and lakes that reside within continental interiors or on mountains can still develop meromixis, despite being entirely land-locked). 

*NOTE : Along with salts, meromictic lakes also obtain large quantities of sulfate from seawater and groundwater contaminated by dolomite. As a consequence, these environments also harbor more pronounced sulfur cycles, rivaling those of typical freshwater basins of Leeuwenhoek.  

    Since saltwater is more dense than freshwater, the two layers remain unable to mix, which keeps the water beneath the halocline (the transitional zone from fresh to salt water) permanently deprived of oxygen. As a result, meromictic lakes, seas, and sink holes house two radically different environments separated by a thin veil. The upper environment is known as the mixolimnion and supports oligotrophic conditions due to the fact that most organic material entering the basin sinks into the layer beneath and becomes trapped within convection cells. As a result, the water is clear and sparsely populated in comparison to the environment below. For this reason, these environments appear clear, perhaps with a slight greenish or turquoise tint. This unusual color is due to calcite particles passively precipitated by plankton and microbial mats. 




(Top) In New York's "green lake", surface waters are oligotrophic and support low population densities of cyanobacteria and other photosynthesizers. However, during the summer months, Synnecococcus (a common planktonic cyanobacteria) populations increase and cause seasonal "whiting events" in which calcite is precipitated into the water column. In addition, benthic mats of cyanobacteria trap this calcite within their extracellular matrix and grow above it in order to keep themselves from being buried. Over time, this process can create microbial reefs known as "microbialites" (which are the pedestal-like formations shown in the image above). (Bottom) This is a sign from the nearby park, displaying the composition of the lake. 


     In contrast, the waters beneath the halocline are known as the monimolimnion and contain higher levels of dissolved organic matter. In addition, disturbances along the surface from storms, tides, and passing winds fuel weak convection cycles, enabling dissolved nutrients to be cycled throughout the anoxic waters of the monimolimnion (This is further aided by microbes which liberate inorganic ions from detritus during decomposition and return them to the water column through a process known as remineralization.) 

     The transitional zone between these two habitats is known as the oxic-anoxic interface and serves as a gathering place for large communities of microbes. These organisms go on to form planktonic blooms known as "meromictic plumes" or "microbial plates". The reason for this attraction stems from the lack of organics and electron donors in the mixolimnion and poor availability of electron acceptors in the monimolimnion.

     By straddling these two distinct habitats, microbes can effectively combine the best of both environments; gathering oxygen from the surface while also extracting carbon in deeper waters and reduced gases (i.e. hydrogen gas, hydrogen sulfide, methane, etc.) made by microbes deep within the sediment. 

     Since these gases tend to react rapidly with oxygen, they are only attainable in large concentrations along the oxic-anoxic interface and within deeper environments. As a result, microbes that respire oxygen and rely upon these energy sources must carefully regulate their depth, lest they travel to close too the surface and starve or drift too far down and suffocate.  

     In order to maintain their close proximity to the oxic-anoxic interface, these organisms must constantly swim in order to prevent themselves from sinking or regulate their buoyancy through the use of gas vacuoles. However, while both strategies are energy intensive, they offer microorganisms an opportunity to combine hydrogen sulfide oxidation with the reduction of oxygen, which enables them to attain energy yields that are unrivaled by other competing forms of metabolism. For this reason, aerobic sulfide oxidizers are able to rapidly grow and reproduce, becoming the most dominant organisms along the interface.  

     Additionally, this form of energy metabolism can be made more efficient through the utilization of light. As a result, many of the sulfide-oxidizing organisms in this environment are photosynthetic, relying upon sunlight to excite electrons harvested from sulfide so that they can produce more ATP and fixed carbon / nitrogen.


              


(Above) On the "Bacterial Realms" youtube channel, I posted a clip from a nature documentary describing the plumes of aerobic sulfur bacteria in Alat Lake (the video is linked in the citations). Since most of the red and blue light entering the lake is absorbed by calcite granules and water molecules within the first few meters of the mixolimnion, very little of it makes it's way to the oxic-anoxic interface. As a consequence, this habitat favors organisms that preferentially make use of the abundant green-yellow light for energy and reflect red and blue light. This in turn causes them to appear purple when brought up to the surface or illuminated. (Bottom) Meanwhile, microbes that are close to the surface of the water and those that are on dry land are exposed to higher concentrations of yellow and green light, which leads pigments capable of absorbing these wavelengths to experience a high level of energy flux (otherwise known as "noise"). Since sudden changes in light availability are difficult for microbes to adapt to in real-time and put them at risk of suffering from phototoxicity, most photosynthesizers prefer to absorb wavelengths that exhibit more predictable levels of flux. Because of this, cyanobacteria in these habitats (such as the Synnecococcus elongatus shown here) typically absorb red and blue light, while reflect the yellow-green portion of the visible spectrum. As a result, they appear green to the naked eye. 

NOTE : Since Leeuwenhoek orbits a sun-like star (in other words, a G-type main sequence star) and supports lakes with similar optic / geochemical properties, it's likely that meromictic environments will be partitioned into a similar assortment of "photic niches", with microbes in the mixolimnion predominantly making use of blue and red light and those in deeper waters making use of green / yellow, thereby turning them purple. However, there are still exceptions. For instance, green sulfur bacteria and green non sulfur bacteria on Earth have specialized light harvesting antennae known as chlorosomes which allow them to capture incredibly small amounts of blue and red light, while occasionally making use of infrared. By doing so, these organisms are able to live in environments that are far too dark for other photosynthesizers to survive within. However, there is no reason for why chlorosomes had to evolve within a lineage of green photosynthesizers. In contrast, a lineage of purple photosynthesizers on Leeuwenhoek had developed similar structures, thereby enabling them to monopolize dimly-lit environments before there green counterparts had a chance to expand their ecological range.  

     Meanwhile, all of this planktonic activity produces even more detritus, attracting a fair amount of organisms with heterotrophic metabolisms. By consuming and breaking down organics within the plumes, inorganic ions (such as phosphorous and molybdenum) are released. This in turn makes them available to the plume's primary producers, which allows for even more growth. 

     In addition, the swimming of trillions of microorganisms along the interface alters the flow of the water, causing most of nutrients and dead microbes within the plumes to remain suspended, rather than sinking to the bottom of the basin. This process is known as bioconvection and plays an important role in locally concentrating important resources within the plumes, thereby boosting their productivity even further (This is a trend that has been commonly observed on Earth within similar environments). 

     Bioconvection also mediates many of the ecological interactions within the plume. For instance, active swimmers will often use bioconvection to "push" photosynthesizers dependent upon gas vacuoles out of environments where oxygen, light, and sulfide are found in the greatest abundance, thereby outcompeting them. In contrast, heterotrophs that are unable to maintain buoyancy or swim can ride these convection currents as a means of staying aloft and remaining close to their food source (i.e. the waste products of the purple photosynthesizers). 

NOTE : In most meromictic lakes on Earth, a single genus or a few species of purple sulfur bacteria tend to be considerably more dominant than the rest. This is presumably due to the fact that these bacteria produce the most torque while swimming and are able to push all of their competitors out of their territory. However, there are also examples where other defensive strategies enable some purple sulfur bacteria to acquire the upper hand. For instance, within the South Andros Black Hole in the Bahamas, a few lineages of purple sulfur bacteria contain carotenoids that purposefully convert photic energy into metabolic heat. While this leads to less efficient energy conversion during photosynthesis, this heat raises the ambient water temperature to 36 degrees Celsius (96.8 degrees Fahrenheit), which is above the limit at which most purple sulfur bacteria can tolerate. In a sense, they transform the lake into a solar cooker and boil their enemies to death! (Since the role metabolic heat plays in microbial competition and altruism is something that is rarely discussed in the the literature, it is something I definitely plan to speculate on in my book.)

     Swimming chemotactic and phototactic organisms (organisms that swim in response to chemical or light) can also serve as a mode of transport for a host of other organisms. By attaching directly to the surfaces of flagellated microbes, small parasites, commensals, and mutualists can hitch a ride. However, since the addition of a passenger would increase the amount of drag the host experiences while swimming, it would have to expend more energy in order to move, thereby leading to a decline in reproductive fitness. As a result, many hitch-hikers are either "selfish" (readily jumping from host to host as they die from exhaustion or from stress due to parasitism) or take on the role of altruists and try to limit their impact on the host cell. In doing so, many of them have reduced their cell diameters to minimize drag and have cycles of cell division that are synched up with their hosts. 

     Additionally, many provide important ecological services and common goods in order to make up for the toll they take on the host's ability to swim. Some for instance, provide antimicrobial substances and protect their hosts from competitors, others offer the host the ability to make use of novel carbon sources or offer fixed nitrogen. Additionally, many share biomolecules, producing amino acids, nucleotides, and fatty acids that would normally be energetically costly for the host cell to make on their own. 

     In some cases, these relationships can even result in the host and epibiont becoming completely reliant upon one another for survival (for context, watch the video on the "Black Queen Hypothesis" down below.) Epibionts can also develop complex systems of chemical communication, manipulating their hosts chemotactic apparatus to steer them towards conditions that are favorable for their own growth. 

*NOTE : As covered in Microcosmos Entry #1, this "steering" behavior has evolved multiple times within meromictic lakes on Earth between non-motile green sulfur bacteria and motile heterotrophs. In these relationships, the green sulfur bacteria encourage their hosts to swim towards sulfide and light in exchange for vital metabolites. Meanwhile, the host's avoidance of oxygen provides both with added protection from oxidative stress. 

     However, one of the most common and widespread consortia found in meromictic plumes are formed between aerobic sulfide oxidizers and dissimilatory sulfate reducers (those that respire sulfate and release it into the environment as sulfide. This is not to be confused with assimilatory sulfate reduction, in which the sulfate is reduced and converted into reactive sulfur species for use in constructing biomass.) In this relationship, photosynthetic sulfide oxidizers produce sulfate as a waste product and the sulfate reducers convert it back into sulfide in exchange for exudate (a slurry of dissolved organics produced by the sulfide oxidizers offer as a form of "payment".) This relationship enables the consortia to create microenvironments with higher sulfide concentrations than the surrounding water, thereby providing both partners with faster rates of energy production and growth. As a result, sulfur-recycling consortia have proven to be surprisingly successful within meromictic plumes on Leeuwenhoek.

*NOTE : Back on Earth, close-knit relationships between sulfate reducers and sulfide oxidizers are commonplace and have evolved on numerous occasions. As a result, they can be found all over the world and within a wide assortment of habitats, from salt marshes to the microbial plumes of meromictic lakes. Because of this, it's likely that sulfur-rich environments on Leeuwenhoek will tend to favor similar partnerships.   


(Above) A planktonic consortium collected from Lake Cadagno in switzerland, involving Lamprocystis (A purple sulfur bacterium / The larger cells) and Desulfocapsa (A sulfate-reducing deltaproteobacteria / the smaller rod-shaped cells). 

NOTE : To help differentiate my fictional microorganisms and their communities from one another, I decided to nickname these consortia "planktonic sulfureta", in reference to the term that was once used to describe sulfide-rich environments (such as geothermal springs and intertidal microbial mats). 

     Similar consortia can also play an important role in ecosystems along the sediment, assuming that the photic zone manages to penetrate all the way to the bottom. In these cases, these microbes can also form colorful patches along the sediment-water interface, ranging from dark purple to pastel pink in color. 

     As a consequence of their dependence upon light, many of these microbes within these mats will engage in chemotaxis and climb over one another in an attempt to outcompete their neighbors for sunlight, forming small "pinnacles". In addition, gas bubbles from sulfidic and methanic sediments below can become trapped within these mats. This causes them to distend and form stalagmite-like spires that rise towards the surface due to the buoyancy of the gasses contained within.  




(Above) Pinnacles and spires formed by sulfide-oxidizing microbes (observed 
within the Lake Huron Sinkhole)



(Above) Purple cyanobacteria and Beggiatoa collected from benthic mats in 
the Lake Huron sinkhole. 


     Zooming out, lakes, ponds, and other inland basins are exceptionally diverse. Given that they vary tremendously in terms of geochemistry, ecology, and nutrient cycling, it's hard to pin down a universal model for how they should function from an ecological perspective. However, this serves as a small slice of what freshwater habitats might be like on an alien planet (For now, this is where are story will be left off. However, I'll be posting some illustrations of the organisms that inhabit the meromictic basins at some point in the near future!)




Citations :

Video Discussing the "Black Queen Hypothesis" : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhEyhju_Iks

Documentary Footage of a Meromictic Lake : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10sBKxBdVfg

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969720363634 

https://genome.jgi.doe.gov/portal/chlph/chlph.home.html 

https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mbio.00052-22

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17906940/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10756677/

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324795723_Low-Light_Anoxygenic_Photosynthesis_and_Fe-S-Biogeochemistry_in_a_Microbial_Mat

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Novel-Bacterial-Diversity-in-an-Anchialine-Blue-on-Gonzalez/96bc659a0ed7d3539cba52d9880a68af6a4b9445

https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/rock-water-microbes-underwater-sinkholes-in-lake-25851285/













Thursday, May 23, 2024

Microbial Musings Entry #1 : "Could Methanogens Replace Mitochondria?"

     
TLDR; Here, we'll be looking into whether methanogens could give rise to complex life on other planets. We also look into how this unfamiliar form of life may develop, leading to some interesting results. 

     Recently, I was browsing through the official speculative evolution discord server and came across an interesting question. In it, Silly_Milly asks whether or not methanogensis (the coupling of hydrogen / acetate / methyl oxidation with the reduction of CO2) could provide enough energy to support "eukaryote like complexity". In other words, would methanogenesis allow microbes to achieve larger genome sizes? 

     However, in order to answer their question, we first have to ask ourselves why eukaryotes are able to support large genome sizes in the first place. As many of you might know, the answer is mitochondria. 

     Roughly 2.1 billion years ago, the common ancestor of mitochondria had forged an mutualistic arrangement with an archaeal host. This provided them with shelter from the elements and from competition. 

     Since they no longer had to invest energy towards supporting an active, free-living lifestyle, mitochondria have undergone a dramatic reduction in genome size and have greatly decreased their rate of ATP consumption. However, their overall rate of ATP production had remained the same, providing them with far more energy then they knew what to do with. 

     Instead of stockpiling this excess ATP for themselves, populations of mitochondria work together, exporting it and donating it to their hosts. This increase in stored energy would have allowed early eukaryotes to develop more costly adaptations that would serve to increase the reproductive fitness of both the host and the endosymbionts. In addition, mitochondrial populations can be scaled up in order to keep up with the energetic demands placed upon them by their host, enabling eukaryotes to support genomes of progressively greater size and relative complexity. 

     So to simplify, the reason eukaryotes are able to harbor large genomes has more to do with how mitochondria allow them to efficiently scale up energy production, rather than something that is unique to aerobic respiration.

     Therefore, if we were to imagine a hypothetical, eukaryote-like cell with methanogens in place of our oxygen reducing / lactic acid fermenting mitochondria, they would still be able to function in a similar manner to their real-life counterparts. However, since methanogenesis produces ATP yields that are far lower than that aerobic respiration (0.5-2 moles of ATP per mole of substrate Vs. the 30-32 moles of ATP generated from the aerobic consumption of one mole of pyruvate), a greater number of methanogens would be required to produce the same amount of ATP. As a result, "methano-eukaryotes" would have to obtain far more resources and chemical energy from their environment than true-eukaryotes would in order to achieve similar energy budgets. 

     With that said, plenty of eukaryotic cells on the modern day Earth support populations of mitochondria numbering in the thousands, so its well within the realm of possibility that our methano-eukaryote could harbor large populations of endosymbionts as well. However, it's also important to note that the caloric and nutritive demands mitochondria place upon their hosts had once played an important role in stalling their evolutionary development of eukaryotes throughout much of the Proterozoic, back when essential biogenic elements and oxygen were more difficult to come by. Because of this, methano-eukaryotes on similarly nutrient-starved exoplanets would have an even greater challenge diversifying and developing costly adaptations.

     Additionally, the presence of oxygenic photosynthesis on alien planets will largely restrict methanogens to anoxic sediments and other environments that greatly limit the availability of oxygen, such as geothermal springs. However, in a recent study published in 2011, researchers found that methanogens in the McMurdo Dry River Valley can survive in oxygenated soils by upregulating the detoxification of oxygen and ROS (reactive oxygen species). This uses up a significant portion of their meager energy budget, but seems to enable them to slowly metabolize, grow, and reproduce within aerobic environments. 

*NOTE : Due to our hypothetical microbe's ability to scale up respiration, they would have more than enough energy to invest in upregulating these processes. Because of this, they might still be able to support relatively fast rates of cell division under oxygenated conditions. Additionally, there's also the chance that the host might start out as a facultative aerobe, much like how mitochondria did. This would allow them to potentially shield their endosymbionts from oxygen, either through the consumption of oxygen during respiration or the use of their own detoxification pathways.  

     Another problem we have to address involves the substrates required for methanogenesis. In aerobic environments, hydrogen gas is in limited supply and is often restricted to the presence of trace gases. While organisms use radiolytic hydrogen in the atmosphere for growth, the energy this provides is incredibly meager and only serves to supplement the cell's ATP requirements. As a result, I wouldn't expect a eukaryote-analogue to thrive primarily off of hydrogen in an aerobic habitat. Instead, acetate and methylated compounds might serve as better donors, since they can be easily sourced from detritus.

     Alternatively, the host cell could have originally started out with the ability to produce its own acetate from more abundant carbon sources in the environment, thereby providing their endosymbionts with a readily available source of fuel. In one scenario, the host might be capable of acetic fermentation. During which, sugars are broken down into pyruvate which is later decarboxylated and converted into acetyl CoA. Afterwards, the acetyl CoA can be used to produce Acetyl phosphate which is later used to phosphorylate an ADP molecule, thereby producing ATP and acetate. 

     This process is incredibly ancient and may go as far back as LUCA, so it's likely to develop readily throughout the universe. Additionally, acetic acid bacteria are incredibly successful and already form a ton of close associations with methanogens, so there is precedent for an endosymbiotic merger developing between the two.


(Above) Here's a quick doodle depicting an endosymbiotic relationship between a facultative aerobe / acetate fermenter and an acetolactic methanogen. The end result of this partnership is 2 net ATP from glycolysis (the conversion of sugars to pyruvate), 1 ATP from the breakdown of acetyl phosphate, and an additional 2 ATP for every mol of acetate used up in methanogenesis. 


     In short, a methanogen could serve as the basis of energy production for a eukaryote-like organism, but its evolutionary avenues would be somewhat impeded upon by nutritive requirements, substrate availability, and low energy conversion efficiency during respiration. However, a relationship between an acetate fermenter and a methanogen could resolve the problem of acquiring substrates.

Sidenote : In researching this topic, I realized that hydrogenosomes (highly-derived mitochondria that allow eukaryotes to survive in anaerobic habitats) produce similar amounts of ATP to methanogens; averaging at around 1 mol of ATP per every mol of substrate. As a result, these organisms might provide us with a window into how methano-eukaryotes might develop. However, its important to keep in mind that these organisms are restricted primarily to anoxic sediments, which would greatly curb their evolutionary avenues (animal and plant analogues aren't likely to develop under meters of marine sediment or within the guts of termites). 



(Above) A random assortment of anaerobic protists 
that are reliant upon hydrogenosomes for ATP.


DISCLAIMER : feel free to use this idea in your own work, but be sure to provide credit. Additionally, I should note that this might make its way into a future project of mine as well. 


Citations :
  
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7289024/#:~:text=Depending%20on%20the%20substrates%2C%20methanogens,such%20that%20the%20overall%20Gibbs'
 
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0020453

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/hydrogenosome#:~:text=1%20ATP%20is%20generated%20per,Succ.%2C%20succinate%3B%20Succ.

A video of some anaerobic ciliates collected from the digestive tracts of termites : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLAdNOQCiik


Wednesday, May 22, 2024

Microcosmos Updates Entry #3 : Microbial Partnerships in Depositional Habitats

     TLDR; While taking some time to flesh out the interactions between microbes in depositional environments further inland, I've developed some interesting ecological interactions. These might end up being applicable to both lake bed environments rich in organics, as well as the marine habitats I had discussed in the previous entry.

Now that I've finished fleshing out the broader ecological interactions in marine depositional habitats, I've had a moment to think. What sorts of behavioral and structural adaptations would these organisms have? Would they be distinct from microbes on Earth inhabiting similar environments, or would they experience extreme convergent evolution? 

     In order to answer this question, it's important to note that prokaryotes face severe energetic constraints due to their inability to effectively scale up respiration. Since there is an upper limit to how much energy these organisms could obtain, there are only so many structural modifications that they can invest in before maxing out their energetic carrying capacity.  

     This limited evolutionary flexibility often results in prokaryotes developing the same morphotypes over and over again, selecting for those that fall within their budget and provide clear ecological benefits (bacilli, cocci, spirilla, vibrio, etc.) Because of this, it's likely that our prokaryote analogues will be "pigeon-holed" into developing the same basic cell shapes when faced with similar environmental pressures. However, this isn't to say that there isn't room for contingency. 

     From time and time, we find cases in which structures and behaviors have arisen within a single prokaryotic lineage, only to have never reemerged again (and with no discernable reason). A good example of this are cannulae; hollow, proteinaceous appendages found in the genus Pyrodictium. These structures are incredibly durable, flexible, and heat-resistant. 

     Additionally, they permanently connect cells to their progeny, providing a network through which chemical signals and public goods could be exchanged, all without giving unrelated populations a competitive edge (This remains a speculative behavior for now, but there is a precedent for this idea, considering that cannulae are anchored directly to the periplasmic space.)

     Given the role cannulae play in fortifying biofilms and (might) have in shuttling nutrients, it would seem that many organisms would benefit from developing structures with similar properties. However, as of the time this has been posted, no such instance of convergent evolution has ever been observed. 

     The same also goes for hami; tiny, grappling-hook like appendages that are commonly found amongst some groups of archaea. Despite being incredibly useful in allowing biofilms to resist strong currents, they have never been recapitulated in bacteria (At least, as far as we're aware of.)



(Left) In this electron micrograph, cannulae (yellow) can be seen emerging from the periplasm (purple) of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrodictium. (Right) Some images of hami taken with the aid of electron cryotomography.

     As a result, we can infer that our alien microbes will exhibit many of the same cell morphologies and physiological adaptations as their terrestrial counterparts, but will also have unique structural and behavioral traits scattered throughout. With that said, I've been working on developing a few adaptations that would explore this theme of limited contingency. 

     However, before we jump in, I should offer a bit of a disclaimer. Trying to predict new behaviors and morphological adaptations for fictional microbes is a deceptively challenging process. Due to the strong pressures placed upon prokaryotes to make use of untapped resources and ecological associations within biofilms, there is a pretty high likely hood that whatever you come up already exists. It's also important to note that the absence of evidence is not the same proof of absence. In other words, just because you don't observe something you predicted, that doesn't mean it's not there.

     The techniques used to study "microbial dark matter" and to model microbial ecology in the laboratory are still in their infancy. As a result, we're constantly learning new things all the time, even about organisms in well-studied environments.   

     Okay, with that out of the way, let's explore some speculative adaptations and ecological associations. In keeping with the theme of marine depositional environments, I'll be focusing on anoxic sediments in waters that lack euxinia. 

     As covered in the previous post, many of the microbes in these habitats have to navigate the difficult task of pairing the oxidation of sulfide to the reduction of nitrate. This means scaling several millimeters or centimeters of sediment in order to acquire both. 

     The most common way in which this is preformed on Earth and Leeuwenhoek is through physically migrating from one end of the redox gradient to the other. In doing so, cells collect a bit of sulfide and then oxidize it for energy upon reaching a source of nitrate. In many ways, this isn't too dissimilar from how whales will hunt for krill in deeper waters, before occasionally resurfacing to respire. However, much like whales filling up their lungs with air, many filamentous microorganisms are able to take a "gulp" of nitrate and store it within vacuoles for later use. This enables them to continue carrying out respiration in sulfidic sediments and to stockpile nitrate in the event the competition renders it difficult to come by. 

     As a result, organisms like Thioploca and Beggiatoa essentially operate as "little nitrate shuttles", gathering nitrate from the surface and bringing it down with them into sediments where electron acceptors are difficult to find. This offers smaller prokaryotes that are incapable of stockpiling nitrate the incentive to steal it through endobiosis (the act of living within another organism). 

     By boring into the host and adhering to the surface of the gas vacuole, the endobionts would be able to gain access to this highly sought after electron acceptor. Additionally, endobionts might start off as parasitic and later develop mutualistic endosymbiosis with their hosts. By supplying some sort of public good (such as the synthesis of amino acids), they could increase their hosts chances of survival and thereby increase their own reproductive fitness.

*NOTE : Of all of the speculative adaptations / associations listed here, this is admittedly the most unlikely to develop. However, non-motile sulfur oxidizers belonging to the genus Thiomargarita have been found to contain endobionts and it has been suggested that they might be there to harvest nitrate. However, little has been determined about the precise nature of this relationship, so it's still unclear as to whether or not they are after electron acceptors. 

     Alternatively, giant sulfide oxidizers could also serve as modes of transport for epibionts (organisms attached to the surface of a larger host, known as a "basibiont"), much like a whale transporting marine lice and barnacles. In so doing, they could carry them back and fourth, from the bottom of the redox gradient to the top. This in turn would supply them with the high energy sulfide and nitrate required to speed up their metabolism. In exchange, the epibionts (much like the endobionts mentioned earlier) may offer their host some sort of public good in order to increase their combined reproductive fitness. 

*NOTE : Some gliding filamentous prokaryotes seem to support populations of epibionts. With that said, there is at least some precedent for gliding sulfide oxidizers partnering up with smaller organisms and offering them transportation. 

     Lastly, filamentous sulfide oxidizers may produce chemical signals that attract diverse, free-swimming microbes which supply them with waste electrons. In so doing, the swarming cells can reap the beneficial effects of nitrate reduction without having to spend energy on traveling long distances. Meanwhile, the host gets to supplement its diet with electrons obtained from a wide variety of substrates. 

*NOTE : As mentioned in the previous entry, this process is widely observed occurring between cable bacteria and a host of free-swimming prokaryotes. Additionally, interspecies electron transfer is ubiquitous across both prokaryotic domains and has evolved several times, providing further support for this idea. 



A.) A pair of filamentous sulfide-oxidizers that have been colonized by a population of endobionts (The pink blob represents a nitrate vacuole and the smaller objects attached to it are the endobionts.) B.) A collection of sulfide oxidizers, sporting a number of epibionts. C.) An "electrotrophic" sulfide oxidizer surrounded by a diverse assortment of free-swimming organisms. 

*NOTE : This sketch won't make its way into the book. The quality of the artwork will be far better in the finished version.  


Citations :

https://schaechter.asmblog.org/schaechter/2008/02/archaeal-macaro.html

https://schaechter.asmblog.org/schaechter/2015/09/pictures-considered-29-archaeal-ninjas.html

https://experts.umn.edu/en/datasets/giant-sulfur-bacteria-host-intracellular-endobionts

Video of a filamentous bacterium with epibionts : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBZk7Fgx-aw&list=PLGbE8ME5yo4AKJDlQwGOOBxQpWrTJSWd2&index=28




Microcosmos Updates Entry #5 : "The Wave-Makers"

TLDR; After researching two unusual forms of bacterial locomotion, I've begun to rethink my assumption that rotary motors are the best w...