Microbial Universe
Thursday, July 18, 2024
Microcosmos Updates Entry #5 : "The Wave-Makers"
Thursday, July 11, 2024
Microbe Spotlight #4 : "The Rope-Builders"
TLDR; Cyanobacteria can form complex supracellular structures called "ropes" that act as protective safe-havens for other bacteria. Here, we'll be discussing their function, evolutionary history, and how they might have aided life in conquering the land.
Recently, I've become fascinated with this cyanobacteria called "Microcoleus". Unlike most of the filamentous cyanobacteria that show up in my samples, their trichomes are housed within a communal sheath and glide back and fourth, traveling along its length like an underground subway tunnel. This behavior is known as "rope-building" and seems to have evolved in multiple lineages of cyanobacteria, but is most well studied in Microcoleus.
At first glace, it seems like such a behavior would be fairly maladaptive, since grouping together in tight bundles would lead to competition for light and metabolites amongst the trichomes. However, it seems that Microcoleus uses its thick, gelatinous sheaths to stabilize loose sediments by binding sand grains together. By doing so, it is able to monopolize environments that are often too difficult for other cyanobacteria to colonize.
(Top) Microcoleus chthonoplastes binding sand grains together within an intertidal mat. (Bottom) M. chthonoplastes alongside other cyanobacteria and diatoms.
For this reason, Microcoleus and other rope-builders are often the first organisms to take root in such habitats and serve as a stable foundation for other organisms to attach to. The sheaths can also serve a number of other functions as well, such as water retention and UV absorption. Because of this, these cyanobacteria are especially good at forming biocrusts (terrestrial microbial mats) in dry, inland habitats and in forming the scaffolding for more diverse communities.
However, there are also cases in which Microcoleus live as solitary individuals and only bundle together in response to the low nitrogen availability (a common problem faced by bacteria in oligotrophic environments), such as in the case of M. vaginatus. While M. vaginatus are not capable of nitrogen fixation on their own, their aggregation seems to attract a "cyanosphere"; a tiny community of heterotrophic bacteria which feed upon the photosynthate (carbohydrates produced via photosynthesis) excreted into the environment by cyanobacteria. In exchange, the heterotrophic bacteria are able to fix nitrogen and gather phosphorous from the environment and share them with their tube-building partners.
The reason for this selective bundling is still unknown, since plenty of cyanobacteria form cyanospheres without sorting themselves into aggregates. Multiple proposals have been put forward, but perhaps the most interesting is the idea that M. vaginatus congregate in an effort to locally deplete the oxygen in various parts of the biocrust where they live, thereby providing their nitrogen-fixing partners with protection from oxygen (This makes sense, given that previous studies have shown that biocrusts develop anoxic microhabitats at night when photosynthetic activity is temporarily shut-down.)
Regardless, their ability to work together with nitrogen-fixers enables them to thrive in inhospitable environments where nitrogen is the primary limiting nutrient. For that reason, I've been very interested in whether similar organisms could have colonized dry, nitrogen-poor continents on the early Earth (or perhaps the similar conditions on Leeuwenhoek.)
However, their fossil record is fairly spotty, with the oldest instances occurring roughly 1.0 BYA in what is now Northwestern Siberia. The late emergence of rope-builders might have occurred in response to the gradual diversification of predatory eukaryotes, poor preservation, or perhaps the expansion of oxygenated, terrestrial habitats where the localized depletion of oxygen would have come in handy. For now, they represent a small glimpse into what life could have been like on the early Earth, back when the land had remained largely unconquered and cooperation was necessary for survival.
Citations :
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0007801
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344383451_A_symbiotic_nutrient_exchange_within_the_cyanosphere_microbiome_of_the_biocrust_cyanobacterium_Microcoleus_vaginatus
https://www.paleoitalia.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/13_Sergeev.pdf
https://paleobotany.ru/palynodata/species/113445
Friday, July 5, 2024
"Turns out that microbes really do use sulfide-eating filaments as buses!" (Follow-up from Microcosmos Updates Entry #3)
In "Microcosmos Updates Entry #3", I speculated on how microorganisms within marine depositional habitats on Earth and Leeuwenhoek may behave and interact with one another. To my knowledge, all of the behaviors I proposed hadn't been recorded in the literature, but I figured that they might have flown under the radar and could still be out there. However, what I didn't expect was to see some of those behaviors come to life right in front of me!
In this video, I discuss some of my observations of epibionts hitching a ride on Beggiatoa that I collected from a nearby estuary. This is likely the first time this behavior has ever been filmed or observed within intertidal environments!
While it's still too early to say whether the epibionts are relying upon the Beggiatoa to aid them in acquiring resources on opposite ends of the redox gradient, I strongly believe that this might be the most plausible scenario given the tremendous ecological advantage it would offer them. Regardless, it's still fascinating to see something from my spec project being mirrored so closely in reality!
Link : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUO-Prg2rMs
Wednesday, July 3, 2024
Microcosmos Updates Entry #4 : Freshwater Habitats, Meromictic Lakes, And Microbial Plumes
(Above) A diagram displaying the nutrient cycling that takes place within a coastal lake in Antarctica. Since many bodies of water in Antarctica receive very little nutrient input from terrestrial plants and animals, they serve as excellent models for how nutrients might become concentrated within lakes on Leeuwenhoek.
(Top) In New York's "green lake", surface waters are oligotrophic and support low population densities of cyanobacteria and other photosynthesizers. However, during the summer months, Synnecococcus (a common planktonic cyanobacteria) populations increase and cause seasonal "whiting events" in which calcite is precipitated into the water column. In addition, benthic mats of cyanobacteria trap this calcite within their extracellular matrix and grow above it in order to keep themselves from being buried. Over time, this process can create microbial reefs known as "microbialites" (which are the pedestal-like formations shown in the image above). (Bottom) This is a sign from the nearby park, displaying the composition of the lake.
(Above) On the "Bacterial Realms" youtube channel, I posted a clip from a nature documentary describing the plumes of aerobic sulfur bacteria in Alat Lake (the video is linked in the citations). Since most of the red and blue light entering the lake is absorbed by calcite granules and water molecules within the first few meters of the mixolimnion, very little of it makes it's way to the oxic-anoxic interface. As a consequence, this habitat favors organisms that preferentially make use of the abundant green-yellow light for energy and reflect red and blue light. This in turn causes them to appear purple when brought up to the surface or illuminated. (Bottom) Meanwhile, microbes that are close to the surface of the water and those that are on dry land are exposed to higher concentrations of yellow and green light, which leads pigments capable of absorbing these wavelengths to experience a high level of energy flux (otherwise known as "noise"). Since sudden changes in light availability are difficult for microbes to adapt to in real-time and put them at risk of suffering from phototoxicity, most photosynthesizers prefer to absorb wavelengths that exhibit more predictable levels of flux. Because of this, cyanobacteria in these habitats (such as the Synnecococcus elongatus shown here) typically absorb red and blue light, while reflect the yellow-green portion of the visible spectrum. As a result, they appear green to the naked eye.
(Above) A planktonic consortium collected from Lake Cadagno in switzerland, involving Lamprocystis (A purple sulfur bacterium / The larger cells) and Desulfocapsa (A sulfate-reducing deltaproteobacteria / the smaller rod-shaped cells).
Thursday, May 23, 2024
Microbial Musings Entry #1 : "Could Methanogens Replace Mitochondria?"
Wednesday, May 22, 2024
Microcosmos Updates Entry #3 : Microbial Partnerships in Depositional Habitats
TLDR; While taking some time to flesh out the interactions between microbes in depositional environments further inland, I've developed some interesting ecological interactions. These might end up being applicable to both lake bed environments rich in organics, as well as the marine habitats I had discussed in the previous entry.
Now that I've finished fleshing out the broader ecological interactions in marine depositional habitats, I've had a moment to think. What sorts of behavioral and structural adaptations would these organisms have? Would they be distinct from microbes on Earth inhabiting similar environments, or would they experience extreme convergent evolution?
In order to answer this question, it's important to note that prokaryotes face severe energetic constraints due to their inability to effectively scale up respiration. Since there is an upper limit to how much energy these organisms could obtain, there are only so many structural modifications that they can invest in before maxing out their energetic carrying capacity.
This limited evolutionary flexibility often results in prokaryotes developing the same morphotypes over and over again, selecting for those that fall within their budget and provide clear ecological benefits (bacilli, cocci, spirilla, vibrio, etc.) Because of this, it's likely that our prokaryote analogues will be "pigeon-holed" into developing the same basic cell shapes when faced with similar environmental pressures. However, this isn't to say that there isn't room for contingency.
From time and time, we find cases in which structures and behaviors have arisen within a single prokaryotic lineage, only to have never reemerged again (and with no discernable reason). A good example of this are cannulae; hollow, proteinaceous appendages found in the genus Pyrodictium. These structures are incredibly durable, flexible, and heat-resistant.
Additionally, they permanently connect cells to their progeny, providing a network through which chemical signals and public goods could be exchanged, all without giving unrelated populations a competitive edge (This remains a speculative behavior for now, but there is a precedent for this idea, considering that cannulae are anchored directly to the periplasmic space.)
Given the role cannulae play in fortifying biofilms and (might) have in shuttling nutrients, it would seem that many organisms would benefit from developing structures with similar properties. However, as of the time this has been posted, no such instance of convergent evolution has ever been observed.
The same also goes for hami; tiny, grappling-hook like appendages that are commonly found amongst some groups of archaea. Despite being incredibly useful in allowing biofilms to resist strong currents, they have never been recapitulated in bacteria (At least, as far as we're aware of.)
As a result, we can infer that our alien microbes will exhibit many of the same cell morphologies and physiological adaptations as their terrestrial counterparts, but will also have unique structural and behavioral traits scattered throughout. With that said, I've been working on developing a few adaptations that would explore this theme of limited contingency.
However, before we jump in, I should offer a bit of a disclaimer. Trying to predict new behaviors and morphological adaptations for fictional microbes is a deceptively challenging process. Due to the strong pressures placed upon prokaryotes to make use of untapped resources and ecological associations within biofilms, there is a pretty high likely hood that whatever you come up already exists. It's also important to note that the absence of evidence is not the same proof of absence. In other words, just because you don't observe something you predicted, that doesn't mean it's not there.
The techniques used to study "microbial dark matter" and to model microbial ecology in the laboratory are still in their infancy. As a result, we're constantly learning new things all the time, even about organisms in well-studied environments.
Okay, with that out of the way, let's explore some speculative adaptations and ecological associations. In keeping with the theme of marine depositional environments, I'll be focusing on anoxic sediments in waters that lack euxinia.
As covered in the previous post, many of the microbes in these habitats have to navigate the difficult task of pairing the oxidation of sulfide to the reduction of nitrate. This means scaling several millimeters or centimeters of sediment in order to acquire both.
The most common way in which this is preformed on Earth and Leeuwenhoek is through physically migrating from one end of the redox gradient to the other. In doing so, cells collect a bit of sulfide and then oxidize it for energy upon reaching a source of nitrate. In many ways, this isn't too dissimilar from how whales will hunt for krill in deeper waters, before occasionally resurfacing to respire. However, much like whales filling up their lungs with air, many filamentous microorganisms are able to take a "gulp" of nitrate and store it within vacuoles for later use. This enables them to continue carrying out respiration in sulfidic sediments and to stockpile nitrate in the event the competition renders it difficult to come by.
As a result, organisms like Thioploca and Beggiatoa essentially operate as "little nitrate shuttles", gathering nitrate from the surface and bringing it down with them into sediments where electron acceptors are difficult to find. This offers smaller prokaryotes that are incapable of stockpiling nitrate the incentive to steal it through endobiosis (the act of living within another organism).
By boring into the host and adhering to the surface of the gas vacuole, the endobionts would be able to gain access to this highly sought after electron acceptor. Additionally, endobionts might start off as parasitic and later develop mutualistic endosymbiosis with their hosts. By supplying some sort of public good (such as the synthesis of amino acids), they could increase their hosts chances of survival and thereby increase their own reproductive fitness.
*NOTE : Of all of the speculative adaptations / associations listed here, this is admittedly the most unlikely to develop. However, non-motile sulfur oxidizers belonging to the genus Thiomargarita have been found to contain endobionts and it has been suggested that they might be there to harvest nitrate. However, little has been determined about the precise nature of this relationship, so it's still unclear as to whether or not they are after electron acceptors.
Alternatively, giant sulfide oxidizers could also serve as modes of transport for epibionts (organisms attached to the surface of a larger host, known as a "basibiont"), much like a whale transporting marine lice and barnacles. In so doing, they could carry them back and fourth, from the bottom of the redox gradient to the top. This in turn would supply them with the high energy sulfide and nitrate required to speed up their metabolism. In exchange, the epibionts (much like the endobionts mentioned earlier) may offer their host some sort of public good in order to increase their combined reproductive fitness.
*NOTE : Some gliding filamentous prokaryotes seem to support populations of epibionts. With that said, there is at least some precedent for gliding sulfide oxidizers partnering up with smaller organisms and offering them transportation.
Lastly, filamentous sulfide oxidizers may produce chemical signals that attract diverse, free-swimming microbes which supply them with waste electrons. In so doing, the swarming cells can reap the beneficial effects of nitrate reduction without having to spend energy on traveling long distances. Meanwhile, the host gets to supplement its diet with electrons obtained from a wide variety of substrates.
*NOTE : As mentioned in the previous entry, this process is widely observed occurring between cable bacteria and a host of free-swimming prokaryotes. Additionally, interspecies electron transfer is ubiquitous across both prokaryotic domains and has evolved several times, providing further support for this idea.
*NOTE : This sketch won't make its way into the book. The quality of the artwork will be far better in the finished version.
Citations :
https://schaechter.asmblog.org/schaechter/2008/02/archaeal-macaro.html
https://schaechter.asmblog.org/schaechter/2015/09/pictures-considered-29-archaeal-ninjas.html
https://experts.umn.edu/en/datasets/giant-sulfur-bacteria-host-intracellular-endobionts
Video of a filamentous bacterium with epibionts : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBZk7Fgx-aw&list=PLGbE8ME5yo4AKJDlQwGOOBxQpWrTJSWd2&index=28
Microcosmos Updates Entry #5 : "The Wave-Makers"
TLDR; After researching two unusual forms of bacterial locomotion, I've begun to rethink my assumption that rotary motors are the best w...
-
TLDR; After researching two unusual forms of bacterial locomotion, I've begun to rethink my assumption that rotary motors are the best w...
-
TLDR; A strange consortium begins its life by becoming an aquarium for a swimming community of microbes, transitioning into a living greenho...
-
In "Microcosmos Updates Entry #3", I speculated on how microorganisms within marine depositional habitats on Earth and Leeu...